Popular Myths Popular Myth

Burn Your Bridges

"To destroy any possibility of retreating or going back to a previous situation."

Two famous historical commanders are regularly credited with inventing this idea: Julius Caesar, who crossed the Rubicon river into Italy in 49 BC in an act of open rebellion with no way back, and the Spanish conquistador Hernan Cortes, who supposedly burned his ships in 1519 so his men couldn't retreat to Cuba. Both stories are dramatic, and both are slightly wrong in the telling. Caesar never actually burned a bridge; the "point of no return" was the river crossing itself, not any bridge-burning. Cortes, meanwhile, had his ships deliberately scuttled (sunk), not burned, according to the more reliable historical accounts. The broader military tactic of destroying your own retreat route to force an army forward is genuinely ancient and well documented, from Muslim forces in 8th-century Spain to Chinese general Xiang Yu in 207 BC, but the English idiom itself only entered figurative use in the 19th century, long removed from any single specific incident.

Myth vs. FactCaesar and Cortes are the two names people reach for first, but neither actually burned a bridge: Caesar crossed a river, and Cortes had his ships scuttled rather than set alight. The general tactic is real and very old, but pinning the English phrase to one specific historical moment doesn't hold up.
Sources: Historical accounts of Caesar's Rubicon crossing (49 BC) and Cortes's 1519 landing in Mexico; figurative English usage documented from the 19th century, discussed in phrase-history references including Grammarist.

Quick react

Discuss

New comments are held for a quick check before they show up here.

Loading comments…

Back to the full repository